There are many things people have not realized about viruses and vaccines. They are so contradictory and paradoxical that they make you doubt the official narrative and doctrine of the virus cult. For example, Edward Jenner developed and obtained the first effective vaccine against smallpox, which was an infectious disease, whose etiology (cause) he did not know was a ''virus''. Thus, in the second half of the 18th century, he did not know the concept of such invisible hyper-micro-entity, and he had never heard of it.
It was the French biochemist Louis Pasteur who coined the word ''virus'' for the first time the following century when he developed the vaccine against rabies. Both Jenner and Pasteur created vaccines for two infectious diseases without having heard the word virus. They had already seen microorganisms under an optic microscope, such as protozoan, bacteria, and multicellular parasites, but they had never seen a virus and, I think, nobody will actually see one.
Louis Pasteur took blood serum and saliva samples from a patient suffering from rabies and put it under an optic microscope. However, he did not find anything new that could have led him to point at the exact cause of the disease, that is to say a new toxin-secreting microorganism. Therefore, he theorized that the culprit might be a much smaller entity, which was invisible to an optic microscope. This new form of microorganism, a thousand times smaller than a bacterium, was the etiology (cause) of the much dreaded disease, and he called this unseen cause ''virus''. Although he did not see anything, he was able to develop an effective vaccine against the disease. Amazing, isn't it? One wonders how did the English physician and Louis Pasteur develop a vaccine to prevent getting sick from a disease without having seen the virus? They did it through acute observation of the patients symptoms, their clinical picture and their labor/social environment, much like a clinician has been doing for centuries.
What did Edward Jenner observe? He observed, what John Fewster had already observed and ascertained, that the people who worked on a dairy farm, milking cows, and got the cowpox, they never got smallpox. Cowpox was a mild form of the dreaded disease; no one died from it. Thus, Edward Jenner came to the conclusion that cowpox gave them immunity against smallpox, making their immune system stronger and conferring it with immunological memory. Then he proceeded to inoculate James Phipps with pus from the blisters on the hand of a milkmaid! And that was it. And what about the virus? Its existence would be hypothesized by Louis Pasteur a century later. When you say that something exists without nobody having ever seen it, then it is a hypothesis; in other words, the virus was a figment of Louis Pasteur's imagination.
What optical instrument do scientists use today to see a ''virus''? An electron microscope, they will tell you. When was it invented? The first electron microscope was built in 1931 by Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll, German physicist and electrical engineer, respectively. But mass media, including Wikipedia, also tells you that Karl Landsteiner and his assistant E. Popper discovered and isolated the poliovirus in 1908. Poliovirus is the ''virus'' that ''causes'' poliomyelitis. How come he was able to discover the poliovirus in 1908 when the first electron microscope was developed in 1931? Contradiction is a sign of ignorance; ignorance is the void that cannot be filled by true tangible evidence, because it is missing. What Karl Landsteiner discovered was not a virus but tissue sample of the spinal cord affected by inflammatory condition observed and described through an optical microscope. It was the pathological micro-anatomical description of sliced spinal cord of a monkey. He only showed the pathological traces of inflammation caused by poliomyelitis, but he did not see any virus.
The biggest incongruity in science that have gone awry through crooked ways.
The major incongruity and contradiction in the virus-vaccine narrative came about when scientific magazines and mass media explained the difference between Jonas Salk's and Robert Sabin's vaccine. They wrote that Jonas Salk's subcutaneous injection vaccine was prepared with a ''killed'' virus, while Robert Sabin's oral drop vaccine was made with a ''live virus''. Don't you find it odd? How can you kill something that is not a live entity but a dead particle?
Biology and medicine teach us that in order to be a live entity, it must be able to reproduce itself on its own through division of its DNA into two complete DNA strands contained in the chromosome, and that the DNA must be contained in a cytosol surrounded by a plasma membrane, consuming fuel and producing its own energy. You can kill either a prokaryotic cell (bacterium) or an Eukaryotic cell, or a protozoan, but you cannot kill something that is not alive, that is dead, that is a dud thing. Thus, as a non-living dud entity, a virus lacks the biological needs of fuel-energy consumption and replication. It does not even secret toxin to break down your cell membrane and enter into your ER to replicate. Only bacteria secret harmful toxins as byproducts from fuel/food consumption through phagocytosis.
The ''viruses'' they show you in electron microscope micrographs science magazines publish now and then are seen as blurred and vague dots, which could well be protein particles which the nucleolus in the nucleus excretes into the ER as left-over, and then it is packed up in a glycoprotein envelope and ejected out of the cell by the Golgi apparatus; in other words, non-living encapsulated protein fragments, like the trash people put in black plastic bags and set in bins outside their house for the garbageman to pick up. These fragments degrade themselves once outside the organism.
What about hepatitis, poliomyelitis, measles, flu, and many other infectious diseases? They are inflammatory conditions, with parenchyma tissue damage caused by inflammation. What triggers inflammation? Inflammatory agents, provoking an unbalanced metabolic and physiologic condition, such as acetaldehyde (produced by liver cells as ethanol metabolic byproduct), drugs, bacteria toxins, amoebas, high insulin and glucose levels, ROS (reactive oxygen species), etc. These conditions are aggravated by malnutrition. In countries, whose population is suffering from starvation, there are always infectious diseases outbreaks. These medical conditions are often called comorbidity.
Written by Carl Wayne. Carl Wayne's real name is Carlos Benito Camacho, an autodidact from Tucuman, Argentina, South America, who grew up in a shanty town. Carlos is in dire straits now, affected by Argentina's great depression created by Javier Milei's wrong and crooked economic policies. You can help Carlos to buy food, making a donation on his paypal account: carlosbenitocamacho@gmail.com - cell phone +543816264880
No Comments